The Soto Law Group, P.A.

     In December 2013, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals held that a general contractor could be liable under Title VII for a hostile work environment claim brought by a subcontractor’s employee under a “joint employer theory.” EEOC v. Skanska USA Building, Inc. , No. 12-5967 (6 th Cir. Dec 10, 2013). In Skanska , the subcontractor’s employees complained directly to the general contractor about the hostile work environment, alleging that they were the subject of racial slurs and epithets including “the n-word” and were subjected to graphic depictions such as a picture of a Caucasian person shooting an African-American posted in the port-a-potty. The alleged offenders were employees of the general contractor, other subcontractors, and third parties. Despite having knowledge of the complaints, the general contractor took no action to remedy the problem, instead directing the subcontractor to fire the complaining employee due to them being a “poor fit.”     ...

             The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) recently issued new Enforcement Guidance regarding employers’ criminal background policies, taking a tougher stance against blanket employment policies that automatically reject job candidates with criminal records. The new Enforcement Guidance is rooted in the EEOC’s long-held view that an employer’s use of criminal history information has a tendency to disproportionately and adversely affect minority groups and, thus, violate Title VII.               Previously, employers had to consider three criteria when making the decision to hire an applicant with a criminal background: 1) the nature and gravity of the offense or conduct; 2) the time that has passed since the offense or conduct and/or completion of the sentence; and 3) the nature of the specific position the applicant has applied for.  ...